非精英法学院要不要搞法律交叉学科研究？
非精英法学院要不要搞法律交叉学科研究？
圣约翰大学法学院 Brian Z. Tamanaha 教授在 Balkinization 写了一篇“ Why the Interdisciplinary Movement in Legal Academia Might be a Bad Idea (For Most Law Schools) ”，引起一些美国同行的热议：
1. Brian Leiter 收集的一些评论 ;
2. “ Is Interdisciplinary Legal Study a Luxury? ” by Dan Solove;
3. “ Non-Elite Interdisiciplinary Scholars ” by Ethan Leib;
4. “ Tamanaha on Interdisciplinary Scholarship ” by Belle Lettre;
5. “ Interdisciplinarity, Multidisciplinarity, and the Future of the Legal Academy ” by Lawrence B. Solum;
6. “ Law schools, scholarship, and lawyer licensing ” by Larry Ribstein;
7. “ Is There an Impending Crisis in Non-Elite Law Schools? ” by Brian Tamanaha;
8. “ Encore – I Couldn’t Resist Saying Something About the Interdisciplinarity Debate ” by Jeffrey Lipshaw;
9. “ Aesop’s Bat and Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship ” by Mark Graber;
10. “ Interdisciplinary legal education: the overt costs ” by Jim Chen;
11. “ On the Impact of Blogging and Legal Scholarship ” by Jim Milles.
注：以上部分链接在河蟹社会需要穿墙才能访问；请自觉使用穿墙术。
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
文章版权归原作者所有。
可谓功利，也可谓实在。