政治学顶级期刊关于中国的研究，都在这里了
政治学顶级期刊关于中国的研究，都在这里了
从2011年11月成立以来，政见已经介绍了一千多则研究，它们来自各个社科学科，涵盖的话题广泛而多样。不过，因为创始团队时的定位使然（ 戳这里了解详情 ），政治学期刊中关于中国的研究在很长一段时间内是我们的关注重点。
我盘点了一下最近五年以来（也就是政见团队成立以来）六份政治学顶级期刊上关于中国的研究（很大程度上借助于 几位学者整理的材料 ，并作了一些最新的补充）。在这近40篇文章中，政见已经做过介绍的占六成以上。
以下是论文的详细列表和政见文章的链接。我们希望成为让普通人了解学界最新、最好研究成果的窗口。不过，如果你是相关专业的学生，希望你在读了政见的简化版介绍之后，也能再去读一读原文啦！
综合类期刊四种：
1. American Political Science Review （共9篇，介绍了6篇）
Huang, Haifeng. 2015. “International Knowledge and Domestic Evaluations in a ChangingSociety: The Case of China.” American Political Science Review.
√ 政见的介绍： 理解国内外的差距：厚此就一定薄彼？
Kim, Sungmoon. 2015. “Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction.”American Political Science Review 109 (1):187-200.
× 政治哲学暂不在政见的介绍范围内
Xu, Yiqing and Yang Yao. 2015. “Informal Institutions, Collective Action, and Public Investment in Rural China.” American Political Science Review 109 (2):371 –391.
√ 政见的介绍： 农村宗族的集体行动力量
Lu, Xiaobo and Pierre Landry. 2014. “Show Me the Money: Interjurisdiction Political Competition and Fiscal Extraction in China.” American Political Science Review108 (3):706 – 722.
√ 政见的介绍： 官员晋升机会与财政创收
Truex, Rory. 2014. “The Returns to Office in a Rubber-Stamp Parliament.” American Political Science Review 108 (2):235 – 251.
√ 政见的介绍： 全国人大代表资格的商业价值
Lu, Xiaobo. 2014. “Social Policy and Regime Legitimacy: The Effects of Education Reform in China.” American Political Science Review 108 (2):423 – 437
√ 政见的介绍： 民生能否换民意？
King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E Roberts. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. ” American Political Science Review 107 (2):166-187.
× 这篇已经很有名了，内容也不便介绍
Shih, Victor, Christopher Adolph, and Mingxing Liu. 2012. “Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the Advancement of Central Committee Members inChina.” American Political Science Review 106 (1):166-187.
× 人事问题，不便细说
Kung, James Kai-sing and Shuo Chen. 2011. “The Tragedy of the Nomenklatura: Career Incentives and Political Radicalism during China’s Great Leap Famine.” AmericanPolitical Science Review 105:27-45
√ 政见的介绍： 数据证实：中央候补委员在大跃进中更为激进
2. American Journal of Political Science （共3篇，介绍了1篇）
Chen, J., Pan, J. and Xu, Y. (2016), Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science, 60 (2):383–400.
√ 政见的介绍： 威权政府响应力的来源
Lorentzen,Peter. 2014. “China’s Strategic Censorship.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2):402–414.
× 这篇不好介绍，你懂的。
Lu, Xiaobo, Kenneth Scheve, and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2012. “Inequity Aversion and the International Distribution of Trade Protection.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):638–654.
⊙ 暂未介绍
3. British Journal of Political Science （共3篇，介绍了2篇）
Huang, Haifeng. 2015. “A War of (Mis) Information: The Political Effects of Rumors and Rumor Rebuttals in an Authoritarian Country.” British Journal ofPolitical Science.
√ 政见的介绍： 实验告诉你：怎样辟谣最有用
Wallace, Jeremy L. 2015 “Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China.” British Journal of Political Science 45.
√ 政见的介绍： “克强指数”与经济数据造假的政治学
Kim, Sungmoon. 2013. “To Become a Confucian Democratic Citizen: Against Meritocratic Elitism.” British Journal of Political Science 43: 579-599.
× 政治哲学暂不在政见的介绍范围内
4. Journal of Politics （共4篇，介绍了3篇）
Ang, Yuen Yuen, and Nan Jia. 2014. “Perverse Complementarity : PoliticalConnections and the Use of Courts among Private Firms in China.” The Journal ofPolitics 76 (2): 318-332.
√ 政见的介绍： 打不打官司，“关系”是个问题
Lorentzen, Peter, Pierre Landry, and John Yasuda. 2014. “Undermining Authoritarian Innovation : The Power of China’s Industrial Giants.” The Journal of Politics 76 (1):182- 194.
√ 政见的介绍： 大型国企在抵制环境信息公开？
Wallace, Jeremy. 2013.”Cities, redistribution, and authoritarian regime survival.” The Journal of Politics 75 (3): 632-645.
⊙ 暂未介绍
Flores-Macías, Gustavo A., and Sarah E.Kreps. 2013. “The Foreign Policy Consequences of Trade: China’s Commercial Relations with Africa and Latin America, 1992–2006. ” The Journal ofPolitics 75 (2): 357-371.
√ 政见的介绍： 贸易如何影响外交
比较政治类期刊两种：
1. Comparative Political Studies （共12篇，介绍了7篇）
Jiang, J., & Yang, D. L. (2015). Lying or believing? Measuring preference falsification from a political purge in China. Comparative Political Studies. 49(5), 600-634.
√ 政见的介绍： 谁最喜欢伪装自己？精英群体
Mattingly, Daniel C. 2015. “Colonial Legacies and State Institutions in China Evidence From a Natural Experiment.” Comparative Political Studies.
√ 政见的介绍： 日军侵华留下了“正面”遗产？一则语出惊人但槽点重重的研究
Meng, Tianguang, Jennifer Pan, and Ping Yang. 2014. “Conditional Receptivity toCitizen Participation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China.”Comparative Political Studies.
√ 政见的介绍： 政府官员广开言路的条件
Truex, Rory. 2014. “Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits.” ComparativePolitical Studies.
√ 政见的介绍： “协商民主”能否提升民众对政府的满意度？
Manion, Melanie. 2014. “Good Types in Authoritarian Elections The Selectoral Connection in Chinese LocalCongresses.” Comparative Political Studies.
⊙ 暂未介绍
Harrison,Tom, and Genia Kostka. 2014. “Balancing Priorities, Aligning Interests Developing Mitigation Capacity in China and India.” Comparative PoliticalStudies 47(3): 450-480.
⊙ 暂未介绍
Jiangnan Zhu, Jie Lu, and Tianjian Shi. 2013.“When Grapevine News Meets Mass Media: Different Information Sources and Perceptions of Government Corruption in Mainland China. ” Comparative Political Studies 46(8) : 920-946.
√ 政见的介绍： 大众媒体和小道消息如何影响受众对腐败的感知
Becker, Jeffrey. 2012. “The Knowledge to Act: Chinese Migrant Labor Protests in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 45(11): 1379-1404.
√ 政见的介绍： 农民工维权激增的关键因素：人际关系网
Steinberg, David A., and Victor C. Shih. 2012. “Interest Group Influence in AuthoritarianStates: The Political Determinants of Chinese Exchange Rate Policy. “Comparative Political Studies 45(11): 1405-1434.
√ 政见的介绍： 利益集团的游说导致人民币汇率低估
Stern, Rachel E., and Jonathan Hassid. 2012. “Amplifying Silence: Uncertainty and Control Parables in Contemporary China. ” Comparative Political Studies 45(10) : 1230- 1254.
× 不便细说
Hsueh, Roselyn. 2012. “China and India in the Age of Globalization: Sectoral Variation in Post-Liberalization Reregulation. ” ComparativePolitical Studies 45(1): 32-61.
⊙ 暂未介绍
Stockmann, Daniela, and Mary E. Gallagher.2011. “Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China.” Comparative Political Studies 44(4): 436-467.
⊙ 暂未介绍
2. Comparative Politics （共6篇，介绍了4篇）
Huang, Haifeng. 2015. “Propaganda as Signaling.” Comparative Politics, 47(4): 419–44.
√ 政见的介绍： 政治课成绩越好的学生，越不愿意“为国家添麻烦”。
Tsai Lily L. 2015. “Constructive Noncompliance.” ComparativePolitics 47(3): 253-279.
√ 政见的介绍： “建设性抗命”：因为信任政府，所以抵制恶政
Ang, Yuen Yuen. 2014. “Authoritarian Restraints on Online Activism Revisited : Why “I-Paid-A-Bribe” Worked in India but Failedin China.” Comparative Politics 47(1): 21- 40(20).
√ 政见的介绍： 正规军和游击队：民间反腐网站在中国和印度的迥异命运
Hurst, William, Migxing Liu,Yongdong Liu, and Ran Tao. 2014. “Reassessing Collective Petitioning in RuralChina: Civic Engagement, Extra-State Violence, and Regional Variation.”Comparative Politics 46(4): 459-482.
√ 政见的介绍： 福建之谜：”半自发性“组织如何减少农村集体上访
Ong, Lynette H. 2012. “Between Developmental and Clientelist States: Local State Business Relationships in China.” Comparative Politics 44(2): 191-209.
⊙ 暂未介绍
Malesky, Edmund, Regina Abramina, and Yu Zheng. 2011. “Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China.” Comparative Politics 43(4): 409-427.
⊙ 暂未介绍
文章版权归原作者所有。
